The phone or in writing Not fully believable, since these were vetted, coached and pre selected This is really used for confirmation that you’ve worked there. Savvy recruiters are able to find out areas of weakness, so work with your references in advance to align on where you should improve. LinkedIn References You have a high degree of control. Vetted references on your LinkedIn profile It’s always great to have confirmation that you’ve worked with others, and see where you’re really strong Believable.
But filtered by you
So for many recruiters and hiring folks this is confirmation –not an unbiased review. Careful here, this can quickly become quid pro quo, and you should be selective of who gives your references. Do this too much and you’ll look like Bulk SMS Australia a suck up. I’ve limited my usage of doing it. Unvarnished References You have a low degree of control. This controversial new site uses FB connect to verify identity but allows people to give unbiased anonymous reviews of your work. Finally, an platform for unbiased reviews, people can say what they really want about your strengths and weaknesses.
Negative information will surface
About you, and the more successful you are, the more likely this is to happen Unvarnished has a series of checks and balances setup to ensure reviewers are real people and have experience working with others. Google You have a variable Mexico Phone Number List degree of control. Google owns reputations, and what surfaces on the top few pages on your name are key. News articles, blog posts, and wikipedia pages that discuss you will score high. Recruiters will certainly seek to find out about you, and the chance to score high with positive content are high. If someone has trashed you online expect it to surface.
